Through the Looking Glass: A Comparative Case Study Analyzing the Origins of Central Command and Africa Command

Kristina L. Kempkey

Abstract: 

This article examines the impetus for the establishment of the U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) and the U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) in an effort to better understand how perceived threats to U.S. national security have evolved since the Cold War. The commands were created because new threats to American national security were inadequately addressed by the preexisting military organization. The Persian Gulf and Africa were considered strategically unimportant, thus there was a willingness to tolerate the awkward manner in which each area was divided between existing commands. As new threats emerged, however, each region gained strategic importance and new commands were established. Without a solid understanding of this process, AFRICOM’s planners risk making policy mistakes similar to those made during the creation of CENTCOM. Based on this study, there are five major areas from which AFRICOM can build these lessons learned: establishing unified command and control, ensuring a coordinated planning process, securing support from its African allies, properly funding the command’s needs, and clearly defining AFRICOM’s mandate.

About the Author: 

Kristina Kempkey currently works as a consultant in Washington, D.C. Ms. Kempkey holds a master’s degree in international security policy from the School of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University and a bachelor’s in political science from the University of California, Berkeley. She has extensive experience in African security issues addressing political, humanitarian, military, and social sources of conflict. Past employers include the United Nations, Council on Foreign Relations, and the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs. Ms. Kempkey has spent significant time in Africa, having both lived in Kenya and traveled extensively across the continent Abstract